Royal Eagle Fund capitalizes a premium spirits brand with established distribution, verified recognition, and institutional placements. Capital accelerates distribution velocity. Returns are driven by revenue growth and terminal brand value.
This is not a pitch deck. It is a working model. Every assumption is visible. You control the inputs. The system shows you what changes. Nothing is hidden. Nothing requires faith.
LP commitment funds distribution expansion, inventory, and brand infrastructure.
New accounts are opened. Velocity per account is managed. Revenue grows as the footprint expands across verified channels.
Awards, placements, visibility, and velocity create enterprise value. Exit occurs via strategic acquisition, brand sale, or recapitalization.
Source-tagged evidence of recognition, placement, and distribution traction. Nothing below is asserted without attribution.
Figures reflect confirmed active accounts. Seasonal variation applies. As of Q1 2026.
These inputs drive the projections, scenario analysis, and investor outcomes in the following sections.
| Year | Revenue | Net Income | Δ Growth |
|---|
These projections feed directly into exit valuation and investor outcome calculations on the following screens.
These demand drivers do not guarantee results, but they help explain why the modeled assumptions may be reasonable under execution.
Accounts × Cases per Account = Volume. Volume × Case Price = Revenue. Revenue × Net Margin = Operating Income. The annual expansion rate projects these figures forward over the modeled horizon.
All figures are illustrative projections based on your selected inputs. Actual results depend on execution, market conditions, and distribution timing. These projections feed directly into exit valuation and investor outcome calculations on the following screens.
Before testing scenarios, understand where the model responds most — and where it is most fragile.
| Metric | Model | Range | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cases / Account / Mo | 3.0 | 0.5 – 8.0 | Within range — typical |
| Average Case Price | $350 | $180 – $600 | Within range — upper-mid |
| Net Margin | 65% | 40% – 78% | Within range — upper-range |
| Annual Expansion | 20% | 8% – 45% | Within range — typical |
| Exit Multiple | 3.5× | 2.0× – 8.0× | Within range — conservative |
| Accounts at Scale | 150 | 50 – 2,500 | Within range — early-stage |
Ranges represent observed premium spirits distribution benchmarks. Model values reflect current inputs.
At the current model position, the primary driver of outcome improvement is velocity per account — moving from 3 to 5 cases/month shifts MOIC more than doubling the account base at constant velocity. Distribution expansion is the secondary lever, meaningful at scale but subject to velocity compression. All current inputs are positioned within observed ranges for premium spirits distribution. From a decision standpoint, improvements in per-account performance should be prioritized before aggressive distribution expansion.
How doors and velocity translate to revenue and margin. These outputs reflect your current scenario assumptions.
Every variable on the left drives what you see on the right. There is no hidden logic.
Outcome expansion is primarily driven by sustained velocity above 0.8 cases/account beyond Year 3. The gap between scenarios widens most in the final 24 months.
Using your selected scenario and assumptions from the Scenario Explorer —
| Scenario | Yr Revenue | Exit Value | Your Stake | MOIC | IRR |
|---|
| Input | Your Value | Basis |
|---|
Ownership = investment ÷ post-money valuation. Exit value = scenario trailing revenue × exit multiple. Your stake = ownership × exit value. MOIC = stake ÷ invested. Returns are pre-tax, exclude fees, carry, and fund expenses. Refer to the PPM for complete terms.
Strategic acquisition by a major spirits group is the most common exit for brands reaching $5M+ annual revenue. Secondary paths include recapitalization and management buyout.
Exit multiples are driven by revenue scale, growth rate, brand distinctiveness, and distribution quality. On-premise-heavy portfolios command higher multiples.
This summary reflects your selected inputs and assumptions within the Royal Eagle Interactive Model.
| Scenario | Exit Value | Investor Value | MOIC |
|---|